Musings: How To Make a Secret Hollow Book:

How To Make a Secret Hollow Book: – How To Do Stuff—I’m horribly entertained by the idea of creating one of these. The problem is that I’d want it to be a book that was in some way meaningful. A random book from a garage sale just won’t do. But I’m never going to be willing to cut up a book that I actually care about. Such difficulties. Beyond all that, I have no idea what I’d put in a hollow book. I just feel like I need one for some unknown reason.

Travel: One Bag

One Bag (all about packing, luggage, and travelling light)—given that I’m about the worst at packing in one bag or packing the right things for the trip at hand, this seemed like a useful link to save. I should restate that really. I normally have every blessed thing I own with me, and 3/4 of it is stuff I never touch. And normally the 2 or 3 things that I need most, are still at home. Maybe I can gather some travel wisdom from this site.

In the News: Study Finds Test Scores Not Lowered by Television – New York Times

Study Finds Test Scores Not Lowered by Television—an interesting study that compared testing results for pre-television communities to current communities. I’m not completely sure that I buy that these communities, decades apart, are a perfect match. So many other areas of difference that have to exist between the two different batches. Still, it’s an interesting study, if only as a beginning point for class discussion and exploration.

In the News: Better Love than Roses

Words of Love More Sought Than Roses – New York Times—there’s something interesting about this article, which tells us that “In the week before Valentine’s Day, people were more likely to search online for the keywords ‘love poems’ than for ‘flowers,’ ‘lingerie’ or ‘e-cards.'” The story doesn’t say where their data came from. I’m guessing the Hitwise company that is mentioned. Not sure how worthwhile or complete their research is, but it’s makes a nice anecdote I suppose.

Daily Work of Varying Types

I did some rearranging in the kitchen, putting up small chrome shelves on the counter. I still don’t know where everything goes, but it’s better than it was.

Otherwise, I was a laze-about. Spent a lot of time on GIC work, if you can call personal research that. I’m still trying to figure out the proposals. I rearranged the forums into threads based on the different details of the proposal. Beyond that, I continued to fight with and be angry about the blog that I cannot publish :(

Daily Work: On a Saturday

I finally finished Donorboy so that I can read Flush. It ended PERFECTLY. Absolutely perfectly. One of the best, most realistic books I’ve read—and definitely the most authentic voices using technology. I knew I wasn’t crazy when I said those other books were all fake. This one if real, and it’s right.

I’ve been working on a category system that uses a search engine. I tried and gave up on using categories via del.icio.us. They just weren’t giving me what I wanted. I’m not sure if the search engine option will either, but it seems a bit closer.

We have GIC resources now, and I’ve also been going through the proposals to try to figure out the details. I still can’t get that GIC Blog to ftp. If I blog and never publish it, is it still a blog?

ReadWriteThink: Figuring Out Swift and Seuss

Forgive me as I freewrite a splat. You see I’m a little stuck on a lesson plan, and I can’t figure out where I want it to go (other than to end up as a perfect piece that I can be happy with).

Okay, the lesson idea: using Dr. Seuss to introduce satirical techniques used by Jonathan Swift. It’s a Dr. Seuss book that I used when I was teaching, The Butter Battle Book, and I found an article that does something similar to what I did. The events in the Dr. Seuss book are compared to the political satire of the Swift’s Big-Endians and Little-Endians. Simple and clear parallels that students can usually see.

My problem is that I can’t tell where the lesson is going. You read both texts and discuss&#8212then what? Do they just discuss? That can’t be enough. And I need to work in an interactive. I could do the simple Venn Diagram or Chart, but I’d really like to come up with something more sophisticated or at least less like a hoop to jump through. I want something that is actually important to the lesson. Not that comparing things in a chart of Venn diagram isn’t important. I just think that I can do better than that.

I think that I need some kind of divine inspiration. I feel like there’s some really cool idea out there that I am just not thinking of for some reason. I could ask students to write their own satirical piece on a current issue, but the lesson is supposed to be an introduction to Gulliver’s Travels. I have nothing against writing satire, but it seems off-topic. Perhaps what would make the most sense would be to work through the historical allusions in the Swift passage that I’m using and then send students off to use similar techniques on another chunk from the text. Hmm. Maybe students are to become experts on certain terms, searching for their historical significance and then explaining those terms to the class as they come up in the reading. Hmm. The class could put together a kind of glossary on the references that Swift is making in his text. So the focus is mostly on research and how Swift uses exaggeration, understatement, and parody to make commentary on society.

If I go with that, I’ll need to make a list of possible terms for students to research and collect Web sites and references that they can consult as they do that research. I could probably use the Travelogue to move them through the sites that include details on the book’s background. Some of the terms would be easier to figure out than others, but it’s likely that a lot are basically defined in their textbooks. They could then go to the library and research the historical references in more detail.

Presentations would be spread through the reading of the book (not all done at the end). Whenever a term is encountered, the student who did the research on that item would provide the background and details. At the end, all students would be expected to piece together all of the ways that Swift satirizes society to draw conclusions about the overall message that the book makes to its readers.

There. That seems like a workable plan. See? Writing and thinking do work together :)

ReadWriteThink: Gender Issues and Comics

The Calvin and Hobbes from 02/23/95 would be a great discussion starter for talk of media and gender. I may revise Comic Makeovers: Examining Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Gender in the Media, or perhaps I could write up a 6&8211;8 lesson plan that uses it for a similar exploration.

In the News: New Media and Podcasting

Education’s Next Wave? Duke Augments Its Embrace of iPods With Beta Trial of Apple’s iTunes U outlines ways that the university is using podcasts in the classroom to share media files. There’s so much potential here: giving students copies of things rather than relying solely on one-time projection, for instance. And the possibilities for professional development are also great—imagine conference sessions where you could copy the presentation media to your own MP3 player. As these things happen, teachers will need to rethink the presentations that they give. Not only do they need to think about what students can see and hear, but how to get those files on their MP3 players, and how to deal with split attention (What are they looking at? The presenter or the MP3 player?)

ReadWriteThink: It Doesn’t Have to End That Way

Finished revising and published a fancy new version of It Doesn’t Have to End That Way: Using Prediction Strategies with Literature, a K-2 lesson plan that now uses one of my computers in children’s literature and technology books, Arthur’s Computer Disaster.