changelog @ tengrrl.com

changelog @ tengrrl.com: Gender and Nike Shox Cog

Monday, July 11, 2005

Gender and Nike Shox Cog
I know I should be used to blatantly stupid gender nonsense by now, but the two commercials that I just saw for Nike Shox Cogs just really pissed me off.
MALE RUNNER: side shot of guy running on treadmill with wilderness sort of landscape beyond the treadmill. An ostrich is running beside the guy, and he keeps increasing the speed on the treadmill cuz, of course, he wants to run faster than the ostrich. He is ahead, but just so. Thank goodness for Nike Shox Cog.

FEMALE RUNNER: front shot of woman running on treadmill with complete black backdrop behind her. Disembodied eyeballs on the backdrop fly forward towards her. She sees them and must run faster to keep away from the freaky scary evil eyeballs.
Let's pretend that the front shot of the woman was required because the thing she was outrunning was behind her, rather than beside her as was the case for the male. I'll pretend it had nothing to do with wanting to watch her b00bs bounce. But please God, women have to have Nike Shox Cog so that they can outrun evil? Women have to buy Nike Shox Cog because they are being terrorized while men are apparently just getting in touch with their animal instincts? If I had any Nike's in the house, I would put them in the trash. I swear. I am so pissed off.

It may actually be worse too. The male runner is black. I didn't pay enough attention to the background—was it supposed to be Africa? Is Nike saying something horrible about black men and animals that I don't really want to think about? You know I'd tell myself that I'm overanalyzing but given the commercial with the woman, how can I believe that Nike isn't the spawn of Satan?



Comments:
Hey, even being a guy, if I'm being chased by eyeballs I'm going to run as fast if not faster than the woman.
 
Have you seen the one with the white guy running from flying saucers? We see him from the front. As for the female runner, at some point we do see the eyes inside a skull. Maybe he point is that she's running from death (i.e. running for health)?

That said, I do find all three disturbing, and the one with the woman the most disturbing.
 
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
 
Post a Comment

<< back to changelog

disclaimer
Lijit Search
search categories
Teaching
Inbox
ReadWriteThink
In the News
Rhetoric
My Writing

Goodies
For Firefox
For Mac
For Web
For Windows

Other
Daily Work
Depression
Travel

release history
January 2003
September 2003
October 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
August 2007





amusements

education

news

people

places

technoise

techrhet

YA lit authors





This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?    Listed on BlogShares